Rehabilitation assessment tools

Published August 8, Sate Operations Manual. Published April 26, Back to Table of Contents. Did you find what you're looking for?

If not, email us at healthpolicy aapmr. The survey addressed issues relating to service delivery, workforce and patient wellbeing across three timeframes: pre-, during and post-pandemic. A summary of the main points made by survey respondents in relation to each of these issues is presented below, while a final section looks at the future development of rehabilitation services.

In relation to service delivery , survey respondents identified a great deal of good work and positive activity in relation to the development, delivery and ongoing improvement of rehabilitation services. Rehabilitation staff were proud of the services they provided. Respondents described a wide range of services that were i providing timely patient-centred care, prompt referrals and appropriate professional input, and ii achieving good outcomes for patients.

They were committed to multidisciplinary and joined up working, with some noting this as a positive feature of current service delivery. However, others said there could be challenges — mainly practical and logistical, but also sometimes cultural — to this way of working. The pandemic had significant impacts on services.

Some services had been reduced or stopped, while others had to adapt to a new way of working — particularly in relation to the adoption of digital working and infection control procedures. Respondents were proud of the work undertaken by their teams during the pandemic. They were also committed to building on positive developments linked to the pandemic such as improved communication within and across teams and services, and making greater use of digital methods for working with colleagues and delivering patient-facing services.

However, survey respondents reported growing demands on services — in terms of increasing caseloads and the increasing complexity of individual cases — as a major challenge in service delivery.

Teams were often said to feel under-resourced, with staff working to full capacity, and balancing the different demands of their job. The additional demands, related to patients affected by COVID , were seen as a compounding factor.

Respondents highlighted the increasing need to respond to the psychological, as well as physical, needs of their patients. If this is not possible for any reason, then a Rehabilitation Coordinator may do so. It is however important, that the SMR is tailored to include questions to inform initial liability, incapacity or permanent impairment decisions where this is required.

A Rehabilitation Coordinator would therefore need to liaise with any relevant teams before organising the SMR. It is important that rehabilitation providers are not asked to organise SMRs at any time. This is because a rehabilitation provider's role includes obtaining medical information and where appropriate, return to work guidance from a client's treating GP or specialist, rather than gathering information to inform decisions about a client's access to compensation or other entitlements from DVA.

Skip to main content. Print version Send email. Last amended. The rehabilitation assessment The rehabilitation assessment requires the rehabilitation service provider to investigate and report on the client's whole-of-person needs, their current circumstances and their rehabilitation goals. Pediatric scales Table 6 are numerous and are usually standardized according to age groups.

Areas of assessment include 1 :. Work Related Injuries Table 8 : Standardized functional assessment that globally evaluates functional tolerance based on a medical condition that is safe for the worker to perform. Examples of these are 2 :. Balance evaluation Table 10 : the primary purpose is to identify whether or not a problem exists in order to predict risk of a fall, determine the underlying cause of the balance dysfunction and to determine if a treatment is required or has been effective.

Cognition Table 11 : evaluation includes memory, attention, language, perception, orientation, learning capacity and overall executive functioning. Computerized tests available promote a more standardized administration of the instruments and ease for interpretation. There are tools designed specifically for certain medical conditions Table 12 such as: 5. When choosing a Functional assessment tool, it is important to understand the sensitivity and specificity of the instrument.

Many assessment tools are available through the web and are free of cost. Others might require the purchase of a license to administer prior to its use.

Thus, it is imperative that the functional assessment evaluator is familiar with the instrument being administered. With the advancement of technology has come the possibility to perform functional assessments in new ways, therefore research is being developed to design new functional assessment tools that might provide accurate, valid, reliable and tangible data.

During COVID pandemic, virtual home Telehealth has served as an important mechanism to conduct uninterrupted evaluations, particularly as a result of social distancing and social restrictions. As the response and impact of COVID unfolds, targeted methods and approaches must be explored to improve quality and relevance of evaluations.

These may be used with remote monitoring applications such as telehealth programs. In addition to this, third-party payers have been shaping how services are provided and what outcomes are to be expected. There is a need for uniformity in assessment tools that permit consistent assessment of disability across treatment sites, across disciplines and geographic locations. Accurate completion of the different instruments is imperative.